No.
South Dakota hasn't declared emergency medical services, or EMS, to be an “essential service,” meaning the state and county governments aren’t required to provide them.
For example, residents in rural areas may call 911 for an ambulance, but it may not arrive due to distance, high demand or other reasons.
South Dakota is among the majority of states that don't require emergency medical services, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures, a bipartisan organization that serves legislators and staff.
In January 2025, South Dakota state Rep. Eric Emery, a Democrat from Rosebud, introduced a bill co-sponsored by Republican legislators that would have required cities and counties to provide EMS, but it failed to make it out of committee.
In 2020, Nebraska declared emergency medical services to be an essential service and is one of at least 15 states to do so.
This fact brief responds to conversations such as this one.
Sources
South Dakota Searchlight, You might need an ambulance, but your state might not see it as ‘essential’
National Conference of State Legislatures, State Policies Defining EMS as Essential
South Dakota Legislative Research Council, House Bill 1043
Nebraska's Emergency Medical Service Act
South Dakota News Watch partners with Gigafact, a nonprofit network of nonpartisan newsrooms, to verify trending claims through fact briefs. Read previous fact briefs and our verification standards and other best practices policies.
Submit questions of fact for consideration through this short online form or email them to factbrief@sdnewswatch.org.
This story was produced by South Dakota News Watch, an independent, nonprofit organization. Read more stories and donate at sdnewswatch.org and sign up for an email to get stories when they're published. Contact Megan Luther at megan.luther@sdnewswatch.org.
